/home/wpurdemo/resistancesuffolk/wp-content/mu-plugins<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Zeldin Monologue	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://resistancesuffolk.wp.urdemo.website/2017/03/10/zeldin-monologue/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://resistancesuffolk.wp.urdemo.website/2017/03/10/zeldin-monologue/</link>
	<description>A collection of writings dealing with current US &#38; Long Island politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:33:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: amyturner2000		</title>
		<link>https://resistancesuffolk.wp.urdemo.website/2017/03/10/zeldin-monologue/#comment-110</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[amyturner2000]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 12:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://resistancesuffolk.wp.urdemo.website/2017/03/10/zeldin-monologue/#comment-110</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;When he spoke to members of an activist group a couple of weeks ago, he referred to ONE comment made in a moveon petition with hundreds of signatures. I looked at it and while certainly unacceptable, the four-word comment hardly seemed like a credible threat. I googled the person who made the comment and author seemed to be an older resident of the district whose name I didn’t recognize. (He said he reported it to the police) I’m afraid he’s exaggerating this threat just as he did the supposed “violence” at an East Patchogue rally. (The police were present at the rally at the organizers’ request and saw no problems, and the press who was also present reported no incidents….). In my view, he is looking for any excuse to avoid having to answer unscreened questions.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When he spoke to members of an activist group a couple of weeks ago, he referred to ONE comment made in a moveon petition with hundreds of signatures. I looked at it and while certainly unacceptable, the four-word comment hardly seemed like a credible threat. I googled the person who made the comment and author seemed to be an older resident of the district whose name I didn’t recognize. (He said he reported it to the police) I’m afraid he’s exaggerating this threat just as he did the supposed “violence” at an East Patchogue rally. (The police were present at the rally at the organizers’ request and saw no problems, and the press who was also present reported no incidents….). In my view, he is looking for any excuse to avoid having to answer unscreened questions.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>