/home/wpurdemo/resistancesuffolk/wp-content/mu-plugins<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Natalia Veselnitskaya was no stranger, she was important to Trump’s business	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://resistancesuffolk.wp.urdemo.website/2017/07/12/natalia-veselnitskaya-was-no-stranger-she-was-important-to-trumps-business/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://resistancesuffolk.wp.urdemo.website/2017/07/12/natalia-veselnitskaya-was-no-stranger-she-was-important-to-trumps-business/</link>
	<description>A collection of writings dealing with current US &#38; Long Island politics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:28:35 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.1.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Chris Cory		</title>
		<link>https://resistancesuffolk.wp.urdemo.website/2017/07/12/natalia-veselnitskaya-was-no-stranger-she-was-important-to-trumps-business/#comment-250</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Chris Cory]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Apr 2026 14:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://resistancesuffolk.wp.urdemo.website/2017/07/12/natalia-veselnitskaya-was-no-stranger-she-was-important-to-trumps-business/#comment-250</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[&lt;p&gt;“…The core of Trump’s business…  was money laundering.” I suspect this is the kind of accusation — akin to the slimy and brutal deeds of organized crime — that could harm President Trump among swingable “soft” supporters and his apparently-oblivious early backers like Cong. Lee Zeldin, not to mention tarnishing his son. Unfortunately, the writer’s careless grammar leaves unclear whether  the “Trump” in the sentence refers to President Donald or junior. I don’t like relaying innuendo, which is President Trump’s game; Democrats should scrupulously avoid it. I hope this gap can be fixed by other evidence emerging to back up the idea that President Trump built much of his financial success on laundering money for tycoons (foreign or domestic), giving them unfair advantages and thereby unfairly denying legitimate financial opportunities to others.&lt;/p&gt;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>“…The core of Trump’s business…  was money laundering.” I suspect this is the kind of accusation — akin to the slimy and brutal deeds of organized crime — that could harm President Trump among swingable “soft” supporters and his apparently-oblivious early backers like Cong. Lee Zeldin, not to mention tarnishing his son. Unfortunately, the writer’s careless grammar leaves unclear whether  the “Trump” in the sentence refers to President Donald or junior. I don’t like relaying innuendo, which is President Trump’s game; Democrats should scrupulously avoid it. I hope this gap can be fixed by other evidence emerging to back up the idea that President Trump built much of his financial success on laundering money for tycoons (foreign or domestic), giving them unfair advantages and thereby unfairly denying legitimate financial opportunities to others.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>