/home/wpurdemo/resistancesuffolk/wp-content/mu-plugins
What I would like to see are 2 things.
(1) A comparison with a similar study in civilized “1st world” countries (Canada, UK, Germany, France, Switzerland, Netherlands, etc.) with better health care coverage that covers the entire population.
(2) A historical comparison: an analysis of life expectancy relative to individual wealth 100 , 50, 20 and 10 years ago in the US. I would like to know whether we have made any progress, and whether (as I suspect) progress has been halted or even reversed.
It will take at least 10-50 years for the effects of Obamacare to show up in such a population wide analysis which measures death rates over many years. At present, only a comparison with other countries can tell us something.
Here is a partial response to my question (2) from the article itself which looks at least at 2 different historical time points: 1920 versus 1940. For men there has been an improvement in longevity (5.9% for the richest men and 1.7% for the poorest men). For women the change in longevity is 3.1% for the richest women. But the poorest women actually live less long -2.1%. This means that if you are a poor woman, you actually would have been better off being born in 1920 rather than in 1940! That is a stunning fact. It is the reverse of progress.
]]>
Note (and this is important) the cost varies depending on where you reside. The different insurance carriers have different quotes of course. And most importantly the cost varies according to your taxable income. Your premium should be reduced (advanced Tax Credit) if your taxable income is below $45,960 for a single individual, or below $94,200 for a family of four.
Here are several scenarios (all of them for a gold plan, annual deductible $600 per person, or $1200 per family) and applicable to Suffolk County residents. The quoted premiums are for the family and represent the cheapest quote. Make sure that your doctor accepts the insurance plan you choose!
Taxable Household income $75,000
2 adults no dependent children: Monthly premium for the family $877 + (depending on Plan). NO CREDITS
Taxable Household income $75,000
2 adults and 2 dependent children: Monthly premium for the family $740 + (depending on Plan). Advanced Tax Credit $137
Taxable Household income $50,000
2 adults and 2 dependent children: Monthly premium for the family $427+ (depending on Plan). Advanced Tax Credit $450
Taxable Household income $25,000
1 adult and no dependent children: Monthly premium $217 + (depending on Plan) – Advanced Tax Credit $221
Taxable Household income $14,000
1 adult and no dependent children: Monthly premium $0 – medicaid
This does not sound too bad at all.
]]>
For example
NY (which has opted in):
PA (which has opted out)
]]>
The Pot Is Calling the Kettle Black in This Feigned Obamacare Outrage
]]>Here are the highlights:
… In many cases, insurers refused to sell coverage at any price to prospective customers with preexisting conditions. That’s a big reason why the number of uninsured Americans had reached nearly 50 million when Congress passed the reform law.
So it wasn’t the least bit surprising that the first few million who have signed up for coverage since the exchanges opened on Oct. 1 skew older than many expected. People who have been denied coverage for years are far more motivated to get insurance …In anticipation of this, drafters of the reform law established a $25-billion risk fund to insulate insurers from big losses during the first three years…
Yes, $25 billion is a lot of money, but it is pocket change compared to the enormous amount of taxpayer dollars that have been flowing to private insurance companies for nearly three decades to keep them in the Medicare Advantage program, which has had the unwavering support of Republicans…
We’re talking a lot of money here. In 2012 alone, the GAO calculated that the federal government spent about $135 billion on the Medicare Advantage program….
Interestingly, but not surprisingly, there was no mention of that, or any reference at all to the Medicare Advantage program, the biggest champion of which are Republicans, in The Weekly Standard‘s “bailout” story last week. If they are sincere in their alarm that Obamacare might reward private insurers with an extra $25 billion between now and the end of 2016, they should be apoplectic about the ongoing bailout known as the Medicare Advantage program.
This months AARP bulletin (which I always read) has a great readable article by Marsha Mercer with balanced answers from both sides to key questions such as:
Everyone should get educated on these questions and listen to the pros and the facts!
]]>