top 0.1% worth as much as the bottom 90%.
/home/wpurdemo/resistancesuffolk/wp-content/mu-plugins During the presidential campaign last year, we learned about Hillary Clinton’s income. Her $10,594,529 adjusted gross income (AGI) puts her in the top 1% of earners. Altogether, the top-earning 1% of taxpayers reported 20.6% of all AGI and paid 39.5% of total income taxes. Since President Trump never released his tax returns we dont know where he fits in. You can find out where you stack up on this site: http://www.kiplinger.com/article/taxes/T056-C000-S001-where-you-rank-as-a-taxpayer.html top 0.1% worth as much as the bottom 90%. Not since the Great Depression has wealth inequality in the US been so acute. And the trend is growing! Unbelievable.
Along with the disdain of the current administration for science or any real data for that matter, just consider the infantile debate on the attendance numbers at the Trump inauguration versus the D.C. Women’s March the following day. Consider the Republican’s pursuit of a health care policy that is predicted to fail and to harm the uninsured, the elderly and even our hospitals, their resistance to funding of research meant to save us from an epidemic such at the Zika virus and their unwillingness to believe in man-made climate change or to do something about it. All this is frightening. The attack on climate change includes people like Robert Mercer, the hedge fund billionaire behind the Trump/Bannon campaign. Across the country, there are even legal cases attacking science and anti-science education legislation.
Fake news fits right into this mix. But the origins are probably more complex. There has been a worldwide shift in how people inform themselves. Books, journals, newspapers are out. The internet, social media, opinion bloggers, and TV cable news are in. There are those that wish to make a quick buck by inventing fake news stories peddled on websites and promoted by Breitbart, and they are getting handsomely paid, per click, on their stories!
So where does this leave us? Asking Facebook and Twitter to edit their sites does not strike me as a feasible solution. That leaves us only with education. As stated in the East Hampton Star: “We need to educate our children, at home and in our schools, how to vet information, how to use fact-check sites such as snopes.com, how to look for confirmatory reports, and how to have a high degree of skepticism. Critical thinking should be part of every curriculum. If you are on a school board make a suggestion. We need courses on internet literacy, vetting sources, and the like. And, young minds should be warned about looking for news that confirms your own bias. They should be encouraged to have an open mind and engage in open-minded discussions with classmates”
]]>